The rest of the defensive features are useless for average dumbusers. If you insist for an AV against well known common threats, get Avira - at least it has the lowest false positive detection. And state sponsored hackers can walk in anytime. 0-day exploit viruses are unavoidable anyway. I don't use AVs since I simply do not download viruses. Definitely not for average dumbusers.Ĭomodo's AV is as average as majority of other AVs. It's more for power users, who know what they need and how to analyze data. Since I have yet to find any replacement to it that allows such detailed configuration, while also being freeware. I have Comodo there, but it's certainly something I wouldn't recommend at all.Īlthough this is an old post here, I'd still like to say that I'm still using Comodo, but only its Firewall. Here's a list of antiviruses that exist and are worth anything: It's why Avast is still around and still very much relevant and good and Comodo isn't. If the idea is good, they'll listen to anyone. It may be it was added because I've been around for a while giving suggestions, but I don't think it was the main reason. Don't waste your time with this program, it's dead and useless.Īvast on the other hand, despite all the hate it gets, I've made a suggestion about Firewall menu arrangement and they included the idea in next update. Like adding option for Containment to "Ask" instead of not sandboxing or auto sandboxing everything. Not to mention they listen to no one and implement nothing users suggest. Any products to avoid?īecause it's a dead "project" with non existing support (it hasn't got any features for years at this point and last update was so far back I don't even remember when that even was) backed by worst fanboy support forum I've ever seen in my life. I checked Avira (because I used it in the past) and it become completely bloated (With a lot of pc tuning crap).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |